Timber Press books USA

July 2, 2009 – 6:30 pm

I would like to alert readers to the new release from Timber Press, ‘Black Plants’ following hot on the heels of their release, ‘Green Flowers’ and the earlier release in 2005 ‘Striking Silver’. It is not coincidence that these titles relate directly to my own titles ‘Black Magic and Purple Passion’ first edition in 2000, now in its third edition; ‘Emeralds’ released in 2004 and Silver Lining just one month before Timber’s book on the subject in 2005. So why the similarity? When I first came to the Northwest Flower and Garden show in Seattle to sign books in 2001, the first edition of ‘Black Magic and Purple Passion’ was a huge hit. I was hounded by Timber Press to sign a contract to produce a second edition. They asked me what I was doing next. I had little hesitation in revealing my next titles. So I discussed the books I had already planned on gold plants, silver plants and on green flowers. I had already planned a second edition of my black plants book. However, when I received the contract, I was wary of the wording and sent it to my lawyer. She advised me to throw it away, saying I would not earn a penny from such a contract. I tried to negotiate a better deal with Timber, however, Bob Conklin, then publisher, told me to ‘sign or we’ll get someone else to write the books and leave you without a leg to stand on’. I said I had no wish to work with such people. I do not regret my decision but I am appalled that Timber should go on and publish titles on the same subjects. I understood the meeting was in confidence, I expected a reasonable contract. Their actions undermine my livelihood. I feel you should be able to approach a publisher without them doing this. These are not ordinary gardening subjects, particularly black plant sand green flowers – no other books existed on these topics at the time I published my books on them. 

I went on to self-publish all my titles. All my books on these subjects were released prior to anything Timber Press did. My books have sold well in the USA, particularly on the West coast where I designed black gardens at the Northwest Flower & Garden and the San Francisco Garden shows in 2003. They also sell well in most parts of the world and of course in the UK where I was born and bred and still live. 

My original works are still by far the most comprehensive books on the market. For example, my book on black plants now has over 2750 dark plants within its pages, Timber Press’ book has just 75. I spent over 12 years researching colour and plants before releasing my first book. I am the founder of the International Black Plant Society and also of the International Society for Green Flowers. Some of the phrases and wording in the Timber books appear to be taken directly from my own works. I am known as the foremost authority on black plants in the world, a position I have held for over 20 years.

My books are available to order direct from this website and sent around the world by airmail, www.karenplatt.co.uk

You can also find the books at good bookshops (you may have to ask them to order, libraries and also on other online websites). 

I thank all of you, the many thousands that have bought my books for your immense support. If you are visiting this website for the first time, I would be grateful if you would leave a message of support. Vote with your feet – buy the original works. 

 

The BLACK PLANT SCANDAL

A certain blogger, whom I do not wish to give any publicity to, but mention in case you come across her blog, has tried to post her defamatory, untruthful and malicious comments here. She has posted them on her own blog. I would not wish to give credence to nor to waste time responding, but I am not fond of lies. She misrepresents, twists and omits what passed between us. I sent a simple message to her:

I hope that if you feel the need to mention Timber Press books in any way, that you will also mention my original works, which are still by far the most comprehensive books on the market”. 

 

Incidentally, I found her on friend Erick Lux’s Botaniverse blog, Erick had met me and said some very nice things about me and my work. She left a message on his blog,  saying she could not wait to get my book. If she was not interested all she had to do was ignore me, but I do believe she saw a way of hopefully making money from my plight. At first she suggested I pay to advertise on her blog.

Since I sell advertising space on my blog, it would devalue that advertising if authors or product manufacturers could simple leave a comment pitching their book/product.

 

When this failed she offered, as she says on her blog to represent me in my plight against Timber as she is a non-practising lawyer (does that mean unemployed?). I rejected this offer too and was subjected to a string on increasingly disturbing emails. It was her who kept emailing me, not the other way round, I am usually very busy writing books and speaking plus other things. In the end I started bouncing the emails back and they stopped. She sent the following to me on 29 July, when I told her what had happened to me:

Don’t push me. I have a post all written out about what a whack job you are, and everyone I’ve talked to on Twitter already thinks you’re crazy. The only reason that I haven’t published it is that I’m not really interested in the topic anymore. So really, don’t email me anymore.

 

Now I find, several months on that she feels the need to portray me again as some kind of lunatic. I wonder if she would like to step into a law of court and attempt to prove this. All this for simply asking if she could mention my books seems very odd to me.

She appears to be very upset at my success with my books. I think I detect a green-eyed monster or is that a fern? What is odd is that some people (any brain cells functioning???) seem to believe what she has written. I have never claimed to have invented black plants, but I did write the first book on them, now in its 4th edition. I did have a meeting with Timber Press in 2001 in which I revealed what I was working on. I did reject their pathetic contract. I was threatened by Timber Press to the effect that if I did not sign, ‘they would take everything I wrote and get other people to write books on the same topic. I did walk away, something I do not regret – who would want to work with such people? I did publish all my books and Timber Press, true to their threat, have worked their way through my list. I did have a plant line called after my book ‘Black Magic and Purple Passion’, from 2001-2006 with the 3rd largest propagators in the USA, and that contract was broken by them on several counts. The RHS did try to take my book the Seed Search in 1999/2000 and it took 6 letters to make them see that it was copyrighted. Copyright exits to protect authors. I see nothing wrong in self-promotion – it’s one of the reasons I am so successful – all authors have to do it. I have spoken widely in the USA, and been featured in most major USA newspapers and magazines as well as on several TV stations. I can prove as can others the validity of all of the above. I have worked alongside the top people in the horticulture industry, I am well respected for my work, which speaks for itself. They recognise the contribution I made to the promotion of black plants over the past twenty years.

Publishers send out advances – before a new book is released, copies are released to key reviewers. And for a lawyer she is not too hot on defamation of character laws as what she has written constitutes libel under English law. Also she has no knowledge of the sad fact that not all publishing contracts are created equal.

 

I think you have to ask why this woman, Fern, is attacking me. How many strangers do you know who would do this to you? What are her motives – could it just be that she realises ‘black plants’ talk gets her to the top on Google and gets her noticed? It’s a great pity she cannot channel her efforts into something more positive than trying to destroy someone else’s good reputation e.g. mine. Thankfully I do receive much support, (from authors and writers who understand the situation and have themselves been in similar positions with publishers) much admiration for my work and I know how to stay positive and not let a drop in the ocean like this have any effect – anyone with an ounce of sense will look me up and realise that my work speaks volumes. I don’t intend to make any further responses to anything of this nature- just wanted to set the record straight. What I do intend to do is to continue to work and to come up with what is new and has never been done in the horticultural world before – that has always been my aim. Thank you for your understanding and support.

 

  1. 12 Responses to “Timber Press books USA”

  2. Hello Karen
    I have your black, silver and gold books and it is almost unbelievable the amount that you know :) ) I am in the music business so I totally understand how artists are treated. Greed and ego are huge motivators, and you are ‘too much’ to fit into their box. I am an artist also, and while the road may be ‘lonely’ it is great that you run your own business and way of life. Thank you for your amazing dedication and your generous sharing of it. I will write to Timber Press (politely) and tell them what I think. Thank you. Silvia St. John

    By Silvia St. John on Jul 6, 2009

  3. Karen; Thanks for the warning I have been working on a book.
    I have just lost my column in the Quincy Ledger after 17 years because they required me to sign a bad contract. I took the advice of Garden Writers, did not sign and lost the position. Bill Cannon

    By Bill Cannon on Jul 7, 2009

  4. I am very glad to get the inside story on all of this. It just goes to show you what a small company with a good reputation (Timber Press) can accomplish when it turns from education and service to a purely money driven business. It undermines everything they have accomplished thus far. Self publishing is definitely the way to go these days. The publishing industry is scrambling. I used to be a huge fan of TP but I changed my mind about them a few years ago when, as a small book shop, I was basically given less than adequate concern. I think the good news in all of this is that the small, independent publishers, such as yourself, may finally start to shine. Thank you for the information.
    Vickie, Tacoma, WA

    By vickie haushild on Jul 18, 2009

  5. I haven’t done any garden books since my retirement from Southern Living in 2001, but it sounds as if too many companies are going that way these days.
    Silvia Martin

    By Sylvia Martin on Jul 23, 2009

  6. Hi Karen,
    You have consistently researched all of your books and they are, and will continue to be, my reference books for plants of color.
    The publishing business is rapidly changing and I think the wave of the future is self publication. Yours are top flight, but self publication is great for “little” books with limited readership, too. Thanks for the info.
    Linda Urbaniak

    By Linda Urbaniak on Jul 25, 2009

  7. I have enjoyed your books immensely and wish you the best of luck with future publications including, Best of Black Plants, I hope is hugely successful as the best form of ‘revenge’.

    By Rachael on Jul 29, 2009

  8. As another author of garden books, I gulp every time I submit a book proposal.It must be complete enough for the publisher to judge what kind of book it would be, but if it’s too detailed any unscrupulous publisher can take it and run.
    Between author and publisher, power is hugely one-sided.
    Yet the year my book on lavender was first published, two other books on lavender appeared,I think totally coincidentally.

    By Ellen Spector Platt on Jul 29, 2009

  9. Quite a cautionary tale. One that highlights the catch-22 of a writer. You must share to be noticed, but are at risk when you share

    By Lydia on Jul 29, 2009

  10. This is a horror story, but it seems to be moving to a happy ending. The more we “talk” about you in blogs, articles and social networks, the higher your profile rises, Karen — and the more sales you will make! Good for you, and thanks for bringing this to our attention.

    By Lya Sorano on Jul 30, 2009

  11. Hi Karen,

    Sorry to hear the news. The definitive source for black plants will always be ‘Black Magic and Purple Passion’ for me. I wish you the best.

    By David Beaulieu on Aug 3, 2009

  12. Thank you to all of you for your support. I have amended the original post today, as I have received a reply from Workman on behalf of Timber Press, to the effect that it is normal practice and customary within the publishing industry to publish books on the same subjects as other publishers/authors. This disregards the fact that no-one had done so before my original works and that no-one published a book on these subjects before my published works – what about all my research that has enabled other writers to write on these topics? And what is wrong with the courtesy of mentioning the original book. Hey guys, that also leaves me free to do a book on blue plants. Wow!
    If you wish your offerings to any publisher to remain confidential – looks like you are out of luck. I remain the definitive source for books on colour plants and still urge you to buy the original.
    Timber Press is now owned by Workman Publishing – their lawyer has made an appraisal of the books in question and deemed that there is no question of plagiarism or copyright infringement in respect of Timber’s book “Black Plants’ and my book ‘Black Magic and Purple Passion” WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSAL MADE TO TIMBER IN 2001. (at their request, I did not seek them, they came to me after seeing the first edition of my book). They do not appear to have checked editions two and three of the book, nor the ebook I have written on “Best of Black Plants”. Neither have they checked out my book ‘Emeralds’ against their book that came out years later, ‘Green Flowers’. Interestingly, they regard plagiarism as an ethical issue, but according to Wikipedia that is self-plagiarism and not the plagiarism of another’s works – see the definitions below.

    You may find the following of help if you wish to write on an already published subject, this is not reflection on any publisher and is posted here for clarification of the meaning of plagiarism.
    What is Plagiarism?
    Many people think of plagiarism as copying another’s work, or borrowing someone else’s original ideas. But terms like “copying” and “borrowing” can disguise the seriousness of the offense:

    According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, to “plagiarize” means

    to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one’s own
    to use (another’s production) without crediting the source
    to commit literary theft
    to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source.
    In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else’s work and lying about it afterward.

    But can words and ideas really be stolen?

    According to U.S. law, the answer is yes. The expression of original ideas is considered intellectual property, and is protected by copyright laws, just like original inventions. Almost all forms of expression fall under copyright protection as long as they are recorded in some way (such as a book or a computer file).

    All of the following are considered plagiarism:

    turning in someone else’s work as your own
    copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
    failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
    giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
    changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
    copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on “fair use” rules)
    Most cases of plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed, and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source, is usually enough to prevent plagiarism. See our section on citation for more information on how to cite sources properly.
    reprinted here with permission from http://www.plagiarism.org

    and this from wikipedia, sourced on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism
    Since journalism’s main currency is public trust, a reporter’s failure to honestly acknowledge their sources undercuts a newspaper or television news show’s integrity and undermines its credibility. Journalists accused of plagiarism are often suspended from their reporting tasks while the charges are being looked into by the news organization.
    claims of plagiarism are a civil law matter, which an aggrieved person can resolve by launching a lawsuit. Acts that may constitute plagiarism are in some instances treated as copyright infringement, unfair competition, or a violation of the doctrine of moral rights. The increased availability of intellectual property due to a rise in technology has furthered the debate as to whether copyright offences are criminal. It is important to reiterate that plagiarism is not the mere copying of text, but the presentation of another’s ideas as one’s own, regardless of the specific words or constructs used to express that idea.

    By admin on Aug 7, 2009

  13. very interesting – I do not have your books, but sounds like I should get hold of them! Chris – Gardening Express

    By Gardening Express on Oct 30, 2009

Post a Comment